Today in many states it's perfectly legal to shoot a native american if you're in a wagon circle. Is that ethical?
Fair use is also a positive defense, which means that only the courts can really say if something is fair use or not.
> Today in many states it's perfectly legal to shoot a native american if you're in a wagon circle.
Could you please clarify this?https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/25222/is-it-leg...
>> “Art history is literally full of transformation of prior works”
There’s no reasonable ethical basis to take issue with. You’re examples and counter points to me add substantive your claims. What am I missing?
That difference is enough to assert that there is a wholly reasonable ethical basis. Especially when they're obviously not just training it on images with relaxed copyrights.
Ethically speaking, for the second time, you ignored that within art world, or real world for that matter, making derivative works is completely ethical if done within any related legal constraints; as such, to me, you’re not making a good faith effort, which is actually unethical if intentionally done, so I will not be replying any further.