> which it apparently doesn't.
It doesn't, because after 50+ years of research, there is still no consensus on image quality.
It doesn't, because after 50+ years of research, there is still no consensus on image quality.
In JXL the quality setting has been tuned especially well to give predictable speed/visual quality output. See Jon Sneyers's posts on twitter showing how quality variance is kept minimal: https://twitter.com/jonsneyers/status/1542560897306185729