Hacker News Reader

Comment by waffle_ss | Hacker News Reader

In Ruby, everything evaluates to true except false and nil. Also, the last statement executed is your return value. Therefore your first function could be written as

  def delete_student(uid)
    STUDENTS.remove(uid) || raise WebApplicationException.new(Response.Status.NOT_FOUND)
  end

View on HN

I have no idea what the annotations mean, but if we use exceptions for transmitting error conditions, then there is no point having a true | exception function.

    public void deleteStudent(int uid) {
      if (STUDENTS.remove(uid) == null) {
        throw new WebApplicationException(Response.Status.NOT_FOUND);
      }
    }

I love it!

And that is the reason I still write in Python or Lisp when I don't need something (Hadoop, Lucene, etc) from the JVM ;-)

If you need something from the JVM and want to write Lisp, use Clojure. Checkout Hadoop extensions in Clojure at https://github.com/jblomo/oddjob .

In that case it is preferable to use "or" over "||" since then you do not have to worry so much about operator precedence because "or" has about the weakest of all operators. This means in this case that you can skip the explicit ".new" for the exception.

  def delete_student(uid)
    STUDENTS.remove(uid) or raise WebApplicationException, Response.Status.NOT_FOUND
  end

I seem to remember this same feature causing lots of headache in C in the form of subtle bugs mostly the result of this being used in awkward ways.

Personally I'd rather have a distinct boolean value to test for, the java version is much more explicit as to exactly what its doing.

Hmm can't say I've ever encountered something like that in Ruby so far. However, if you want a strict boolean it's pretty easy to get:

  !!STUDENTS.remove(uid)

In Ruby, you don't write code, code writes you! ;-)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com