Please. If Russia wanted to keep selling gas to the EU they could have, you know, stopped invading Ukraine.
Also, comment history is nearly 100% pro-Russian talking points.
Provide counter-arguments, sources and materials that can help educate the people you think are wrong in their analysis and research
I do my best to document and source my claims, and you know that since you checked my past comments, i do my homework
And no i'm not pro-russian, it's called impartiality
2. The United States is already at max capacity for its export capabilities. There is no incremental supply to satisfy demand.
3. Destroying foreign supply when demand can't be met only serves to destroy demand because it forces the market to move to alternatives (case in point: OPEC and how they try to not let oil prices get too high or low).
It's ludicrous to suggest the US has a significant economic interest in executing some sort of industrial sabotage on NS1/2.
Your link doesn't support your claim that this is economically motivated.
"If Russia invades, that means tanks or troops crossing the -- the border of Ukraine again, then there will be -- there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2,"
Even if it were a threat to destroy the pipeline if Russia invaded, Russia invaded. So now what would you expect to happen?
It's only just the beginning
Quickening the cut from gazprom is in their plan, considering: https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/gazprom-says-groups-...
We can all pretend and not see what's happening, but then you have this: https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/russias-gazprom-keep...
So the question is, why it is fine to let gas transit from Ukraine, is that to let them get their juicy royalties? so this sparks the question of corruption, who fuel and allow that corruption?
I do not pretend to know everything, but i read a lot and that's the best conclusion i can make, so far, there is clear evidence that the US doesn't want the EU to get their supply from elsewhere, Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict is yet another evidence, wich is where EU wanted to get some of their supply
Worse, US's gas production is illegal in the EU, they don't allow the production within their soil, so it's clear evidence that they were forced to buy US's supply
I can also predict the future, the US will build nuclear power plants int the EU, instead of EU getting them from France, all started when the US built them for ukraine back in the days, the motive was clear
Wich is why France sold their companies to the US, and had to loose some due to some shaddy stuff (Alstom), it's clear current French government works with US's interests in mind, same for Ursula von der Leyen and her team of european bureaucrats
Yeah, coz of the war. Before the war they couldnt shift it.
>The US has tried to talk the europeans out of depending on russian gas for decades. Of course we want all the customers we can find, but there's no shortage of customers!
There was in 2021. LNG is particularly unappealing to countries with a pipeline.
There's a reason that, much to America's chagrin, Germany have zero LNG port capacity.
Sure, but it's not like they can build large LNG cargo ships overnight.
Per Wikpedia: "According to SIGTTO data, in 2019 there were 154 LNG carriers on order, and 584 operating LNG carriers" -https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LNG_carrier
So sounds like they were already backordered ridiculously. Something tells me it has only gotten worse since.
Cha-Ching!
The US gets all of his uranium mostly from that region of the world: https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/nuclear/where-our-uraniu...
The US also has a documented history for such thing, both in the middle east, asia, and in south america (eg: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_r...)
The timing is too perfect, maybe gas is not the motive, maybe it is to expand OTAN over there? who knows
Do you remember the failed coup in Turkey? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Turkish_coup_d%27%C3%A9ta...
This region of the world is for sure very hectic, a lot of data to dissect and analyse
Israel is a little bit too silent these days imo, i need to dig deeper maybe
The termination of their operation has been a done deal for a while. The US has no interest in sabotaging them: it's already a done deal that the US will supply the EU with gas instead of Russia:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-27/europe-is...
These facts won't prevent Russian bots from spreading conspiracy theories, in the service of Putin's murderous regime, of course.
https://www.thelocal.dk/20220407/danish-pm-rebuts-russian-am...
https://www.dvidshub.net/news/422733/us-military-makes-histo...
Who are they? are they russian by identity, american by faith?
US military was there, in the baltic sea
Like bruh, my name is from Trinidad. Entirely different continent from India/Asia.
So this means you have found potential justifications for crimes against Humanity?
Also stop mixing facts of past governments and past eras with judging present nations.
Also, I don't have anything against Indians (on the contrary, I like India I even learned a little bit of Hindi, and I love bhajans), I just hate the part of this nation that thinks that the West is an enemy.
So please don't pull my leg saying that "it was a xenophobic slur" or whatever.
Your list of submissions nailed the coffin about what I think of you. Sorry dude.
The US invests trillions in reducing global warming yet you think they'd leak thousands of tons of methane in the air just like that??? .......
The whole free world wants to reduce global warming, so democratic governments want too, in agreement with the population wish.
Same in France, where ecology has been a huge point of debate during the elections.
Same in many countries, etc...
The government and their politicians never get judged by their results, but by the means they put in place. They will go harder next time and request more money, stricter regulations, and more power to fight global warming.