That's the current best estimate for warming in the time period you are suggesting.
India has a bigger problem with feeding it's population which is likely to be the biggest in the world by that point.
To suggest to the most populated place in the world in 2050 will have no people is hyperbolic.
The gates foundation has the best estimates on this topic and their estimates also suggest growth in the region.
While the mean temperature rises, e.g. by 1 centigrade, you have to account for variance increasing too.
India might become unlivable not because the mean temperature rises, but because extreme, deadly events will become standard during certain periods of the year.
You are agreeing with it not on the merits but on the premises.
Get a heat pump or an air conditioner and move on.
Yes, electrification is a solved problem. Look how quickly the US electrified rural America, and that’s when it was a new concept. For a more recent example of using known technology, look at how quickly China electrified from the 80s-00s.
We can't air condition the crops and our animal stock. We probably can't even air condition all the humans in every location. Texas can barely keep it's grid going right now.
I appreciate not everything grows in hot conditions, and there is a point where nothing will grow, but i would assume india would still be in the range where some things will grow, even if it sucks for humans.
We already see this too, depending on whether or not we choose to blame climate change there have been a number of weather events impacting the supply and price of various farmed goods. Lettuce became somewhat of a luxury commodity in Australia due to recent flooding, for just one example. That sort of thing will become more frequent.
Anyway, my two examples were Boston and Phoenix, which are on more stable major grids.
You are trying to change the temperature in an insulated apartment-sized block of space in an effectively infinite ambient environment which is either 0 or 110, while one or more 100W heaters is moving around in it. There's conduction and radiation and convection, all helping out or hindering.
People don’t live in perfectly insulated boxes and even the best insulation that is actually livable (doesn’t suffocate you) will let through more than the 10MJ a person gives off through the course of the day. For context, a plug-in space heater is 1500 watts and that struggles to maintain the heat in a well-insulated 300 sq ft shop when it’s under 40F.
Humans shouldn’t be living in the cold if you care about energy consumption. It’s just so normalized and we figured out how to burn wood so long ago that nobody thinks twice about it.