Please! Ive been very unconvinced by the stuff I've seen so far that used statistics. Ex. the deepest post I saw was still pretty shallow and either I'm missing an implication, or they didn't say anything helpful. Iirc it left off at "if he's 'actually' the player before his rise, he's 1 in a 1000, if he's actually the player he is after the rise, he's been playing poorly"