The fact that private businesses can choose who to do business with, without stepping on these freedoms like free speech is a feature, not a bug.
You cannot force someone to agree with your speech. You especially cannot force a business to deal with you if they don’t want to.
Then why was segregation outlawed?
Just try to join a branch of the KKK as a person of color, and see how far you'll get...
> It’s convenient that you preempted the argument that kills your entire comment, you made everyone else’s job easier.
Ironic, you just did the thing you accused me of.
Putting that aside, "You especially cannot force a business to deal with you if they don’t want to" is where I disagree with you. In the case of a bakery, I agree with you. In the case of what could be classified as a public utility, such as a payment system, is where I disagree with you. Certain services which have monopolistic or near monopolistic positions and being necessary to participate in the economy (paypal) or society (facebook) should not be in the business of policing speech. And it is the governments role in making sure this is the case (as the collective muscle of the people to ensure their rights are maintained). We've been indoctrinated for decades to fear and limit the ability of the government to do as such, as well as indoctrinated for decades to place the rights of business interests above our own rights as citizens. I argue to break this position of slavery and place our rights first. Why shouldn't Paypal be forced to do business with me?
I can much easier leave a corporation and not give them money. The government has “a legal monopoly on violence”.
It shouldn’t be forced to do business with you because it is a private business and not the government.
It also is nowhere near a monopoly. Plenty of payment processors exist. Another comment here literally talks about new ones springing up.
It is equivalent to the bakery store in your example.