I just googled it myself. Whoever is doing his PR needs to be sacked for leaving him open to a photo like that.
But yeah, I assume there's someone whose job is to avoid things like this who wasn't doing their job very well.
https://www.inquirer.com/news/philadelphia-joe-biden-picture...
Such a market split indicates the framing was intentionally authoritarian and meant to provoke/intimidate political rivals.
That is massively different than the pic in the article.
90% of the video is not sinister-looking.
The speech following that brief crowd segment is the red with marines behind him — at a point where the light was on, rather than the one featured in the photo.
I think there’s a reason you deep linked rather than show the beginning: the start is exactly the dark red set shown in the photo.
I’d encourage people to watch from the beginning, where they dim the lights to get that effect:
If you're scared of the color red, IDK what to tell you.
The time I linked was random after clicking through the video to prove my memory right.
Show me a time in the video that backs up your argument.
It’s literally the start of the video, where they dim the lights to get that dark scene.
Tell me you didn’t watch your own source without telling me you didn’t watch your own source, LOL
You're just a troll.
You’re outright lying that the lighting is different: they immediately dim the lights at the start of that video to get the dark red scene.
I have some serious questions why you’re trying to get people to “ignore their lying eyes” and dismissing people who are pointing out that photo matches the scene intentionally created at the start of the video as trolls.
I don’t find that genuine.
Strange that they’re now trying to make law enforcement misconduct the new “economic anxiety.”
- all US feeds of the speech were the angry red, except CNN who digitally altered it to pink
- international feeds had a wider angle that included blue
The speech wasn't any better.
US markets had the red backdrop dictator scene, while international markets had a blue-and-red shot.
The Biden PR team intentionally broadcast a dictator speech, while broadcasting a different look internationally — an act meant to provoke and intimidate political rivals.
Edit:
I’m not sure your point?
The speech following that brief crowd segment is the red with marines behind him — at a point where the light was on, rather than the one featured in the photo.
I think there’s a reason you deep linked rather than show the beginning: the start is exactly the dark red set shown in the photo.
People should watch from the start —
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JemWkV2Vcic
You’re the only one here being a “joker”.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JemWkV2Vcic&t=44s
You don't think there's anything scary or fucked up about the imagery Biden is presenting, where it's him in front of a red-and-black shadowy military force?
The stage at CPAC was literally shaped like a Nazi symbol. They banner there said something like "we are all domestic terrorists" - there were confederate flags inside the capitol building on Jan 6th.
Trump held the bible upside down.
Trump's supporters: https://www.nysenate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/anna-m-kapl...
Trump using more nazi symbolism: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/18/us/politics/facebook-trum...
blah blah blah
I don't take the Biden stuff any more seriously than the CPAC stuff or Trump stuff above.
Do you disagree, or do you think that it's all a part of some secret imagery to tell us "what they are really thinking?"
I don't think this discussion is going anywhere productive
Why can't you answer my questions?