A lie travels halfway around the world before the truth gets its pants on.
A lie travels halfway around the world before the truth gets its pants on.
Because this story was a lie, the narrative about the nature of racial discrimination is false? That seems like a stretch.
The "names impact hiring" thing is pretty well established, factually, so it's not surprising that folks would believe a tweet thread that seems to align with established fact.
I remember a passionate argument I had about some unsourced story of poor Stripe customer support. The other guy was genuinely baffled why I would question the poor merchant who was being so cruelly mistreated.
I think it should be obvious that this person never actually ran the experiment, and merely reported what they expected the difference to be.
"It doesn't matter if it's true or not, it could have been true" is a particular kind of reasoning I've seen a few times over the years, from different ideological perspectives.
"I own a real dinosaur"