Code typing is a practice of typing code, really. Why some people building their code editors like NASA engineers building the next rocket to send us to the next habitable Earth?
You don't need to meticulously craft your code editor, stop overthinking.
You don't need to, in the sense that you can craft code in anything, but surely anyone who is an expert in their editor of choice—whatever that editor may be—would feel a huge productivity hit if forced to use another, formally equivalent, editor.
>Let me mirror that with a sarcasm
It is a remark to the post's argument. Indeed someone doesn't need a note-taking system but their productivity may increase with one. (Whatever a note-taking system is to someone.)
> >Let me mirror that with a sarcasm
I didn't miss it, but I guess I misunderstood its scope:
> Let me mirror that with a sarcasm:
> Code typing is a practice of typing code, really. Why some people building their code editors like NASA engineers building the next rocket to send us to the next habitable Earth?
> You don't need to meticulously craft your code editor, stop overthinking.
I thought that the second paragraph was the sarcastic one, and the third paragraph was the sensible rebuttal. On re-reading, interpreting the second and third paragraphs both as sarcasm makes more sense.