To be clear, I'm not saying OP is wrong, it would probably work out fine. But this seems like a fun angle to consider.
To be clear, I'm not saying OP is wrong, it would probably work out fine. But this seems like a fun angle to consider.
> You can just put the same price on debris addition.
Indeed. A small tax that matches the cost of debris capture payment + minor administrative overhead would encourage the outcome that junk isn't thrown into unrecoverable orbit.
If that fee is the entire estimated near-term cost to recover the object, it would also create incentives for entities putting large amounts of mass in orbit to focus on improved strategies for removal: if removal becomes lower cost than the fee, it's worth paying someone to recover your debris if a satellite fails in order to recover the fee.
I can't even find their account https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=xboneslife
Wonder what happened...
I went to reply to the user, then got a "comment deleted" error. First time I've seen that on HN.
The govt can include the cleanup cost as part of the launch licensing cost.