Citation for boosters not working?
more people have died since the shots, than before, come on bro! It's staring you in the face
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/all-you-need-to-know-abo...
What would you consider a worthy citation source, the same people who have lied or been wrong about everything to date?
No need for goofy phd words like “robust inferences”
Much more than 70% of the at risk population were injected, they are the ones that are dying. That shots were sold as stopping the virus entirely, “If you get this shot you won’t get the virus” let alone die from it!
So why have there been more deaths since the shots than before?!
The shots don’t work. Not only do they not work, they are killing people. In mRNA injected countries, excess deaths are running well above historical norms.
Not only are they killing people, they are preventing people from being born. In mRNA injected countries birth rates are way down.
The number of people who have died from the virus after shots were introduced, that were supposed to stop people from contracting the virus, let alone dying from it, is bigger than the smaller number of people who died from the virus before the shots were introduced.
Do you find this an important data point? Do you think it is enough to win the prize? Do you want to co-author with me? Where should we publish?
Suffice it to say that I don't think that chart means what you think it means.
Birth rate trends in Israel, German and Russia are the same as in prior years
https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/DEU/germany/birth-rate
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/new-data-from-germany-birt...
The effect we are talking about is something that necessarily only shows up within the past year, 9 months after young people started getting the shots.
A line chart going back 70 years is not useful here.
If you look at the data, linked above, where it is possible to see the effect I’m referring to, it is not something to blithely dismiss with a chart where it isn’t even possible for the effect to be visible.
Birth rates may be down over the long term, but year to year they are fairly stable, we are seeing moves to the downside hugely outside the range of normal year to year variability. And we are seeing it in a wide range of different populations with the commonality that we are seeing this hugely statistically significant effect occur in all these various populations like clockwork nine months after the young people in those populations started getting the shots.
>This is a continuation of my post from yesterday about a massive 13% decline in births in Germany. Such a decline is a nine-sigma event, meaning that it is so unlikely to occur by chance, that it would naturally happen as rarely as an asteroid striking the Earth
…
When expressed in “sigmas”, units of standard deviation, the 23.24% drop in the birth rate in Taiwan is a 26-sigma event!
This is can be described as “unimaginable” in terms of the likelihood of happening due to random chance
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/depopulation-of-taiwan
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/taiwan-birth-rate-cratered...
https://igorchudov.substack.com/?sort=search&search=Taiwan
Regarding “excess deaths,” I maybe should’ve mentioned I was referring to what has come to be called “non-COVID excess deaths.” The excess deaths are found in statistics of “all cause mortality.”
Is data for non-COVID excess deaths available for Russia and Iran?
In Germany birth rates are way up for April and May
I'm sure Igor will find something else to get upset about, as hysterics typically do
I don’t have any citations on hand, but should be easy enough to search for, especially now.