https://erdgasspeicher.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/ines_ga...
Here is table from Sunday which also shows the total gas stored in each country, along with the capacity ("Working volume"), annual consumption, and injection / withdrawal capacities:
Missing from the list is Switzerland, which does not have any gas storage capacities at all.
There's also Bert's Gazmon for quick overview
The UK also produces about half of it natural gas.
Each country has differing reliance on natural gas too. The UK is particularly reliant, for example.
Only the Netherlands looks well prepared - 8.8Mtpa of LNG import capacity, 120TWh of storage and a relatively small population.
Somebody should make a model of country per country screwedness that takes all of this into account.
https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2022-09-07/debates/9AFA9...
Germany has never had significant gas production and is heavily gas dependent so has built up storage facilities for strategic reasons.
The mistake made was that since 2004, the UK has become a gas importer with a greater fraction of imports every year. There was then a series of judgements made by successive governments that:
1) Gas was only a bridge fuel from which the UK would move away over time
2) The UK network is also essentially directly coupled into the Norwegian gas system which is and was massive
3) The UK has proportionately a very large amount of LNG terminal capacity
Therefore it was decided that it was not necessary either to develop more storage capacity nor indeed to pay for the re-completion of Rough in order to keep it operating. This now seems to have been a serious error.
This is particularly true because:
1) The UK, like The Netherlands, is almost entirely gas heated, Germany is also heavily gas dependent but heating mixes vary across European countries by a lot more than most people appreciate. This is because the UK and The Netherlands discovered gas early and gas is a brilliant heating fuel (apart from the whole global warming thing...). Norway, which discovered gas in large quantities only after it had already built hydro infrastructure and invested in electric heating, doesn't use much gas for heating domestically.
2) The UK has a lot of renewables and very little hydro and has therefore developed over the last decade into a gas + renewables electrical grid and closed its coal power plants. The great wave of nuclear AGR shutdowns has barely started but the Magnoxes are mostly offline already. Other European countries have kept their coal plants around either in daily use or on standby and are therefore able to bring them back. The GB grid simply doesn't have much idled but non-demolished coal capacity left on it.
3) Although, unlike most EU power markets, the GB electricity market is not pure "energy only" and has a capacity market, like those markets, electricity is priced at the marginal cost which in most hours is set by gas generation.
So the UK gets a double whammy of gas price effects.
What if the people not paying decide that, since they are not paying, they might as well use as much as possible?
All it would take is a charismatic populist to come along and to promote such a thing for any reserves to be gone.
I am not sure that having LNG ports makes much difference if you have a minor currency such as Sterling and you have to just print more of it to pay for LNG. Other customers might have a manufacturing base or lots of gold, which would trump paper money.
Edit: Correction, it's for ALSI, not AGSI, sorry about that. We should add AGSI now that the API is available.