>Is this some kind of nihilistic moral relativism thing you’re playing at here? Otherwise I’m unclear what your point is.
I thought my point is obvious. I'm saying your descriptions are unconvincing.
The obvious path forward is to describe your "bubble" in further detail. What was the nobel prize for?
> A factor in my judgement about whether the people I’ve met who dwarfed me with their intelligence were actually intelligent? Yeah I’d say it’s a factor :).
I think this sentence shows you're unable to sense the implications of my statement. Why would I care about your judgement at all? Nobody cares, especially if we think you live in a <small> bubble. Does this clarify the next step? I'm basically asking for a more detailed description of your "bubble" so that I and others reading can make their own judgements about your bubble and the validity of your claim.
So far your arguments of "academia" and "nobel prize" are unconvincing to me. Is that not obvious? I thought it was, I guess I need to be more explicit next time.