Two peasants find a frog and take a bet. One says he can eat the frog raw and the other bets $5 that he cannot. So the first peasant starts to eat the frog; halfway through he starts to feel nauseous. The second one starts to regret the $5 that he's about to lose. So he offers to reverse the bet - $5 back for eating the remaining half of the frog. The first one agrees and the second one eats the remaining half of the frog.
They walk for a bit and one asks the other "Hey, why exactly did we eat that frog?".
Not so much in restaurants but I was invited to a friends house and that was part of the meal. Tasted kinda like chewy chicken wings, not bad.
Snails, on the other hand, are not too difficult to find in supermarkets.
I cross the line at eating spiders. Nope
Frog leg porridge is really easy to find in Singapore, for example.
It appears to have actually been coined by a late 18th century French humorist: https://quoteinvestigator.com/2013/04/03/eat-frog/
That said, I was very surprised by the quality of the article, and the writing. I was expecting yet another bucket of self-help motivating bullshit and it's the opposite of that! And also quite funny.
"If your job requires you to eat a toad, do it first. If it requires you to eat two, eat the bigger one first."
The book itself is probably a wink to that Mark Twain quote.
(Sorry.)
Edit: It's too early, thanks to the more awake commenters to point out the pun ;)
I hate this joke. There's a bakery I used to drive past called the "House of Pain".
Edit: Oh. Pat yourself on the back for a pun well played. Whooshed straight over my head! Take my angry upvote ;)
And yeah, just the legs.
Also they once were a very "poor" (please read as cheap) meal, while nowadays they tend to be "gourmet".
BTW. I had also expected the article to be about actual frogs: about how endangered some species are, or how the flesh may contain pollutants or diseases.
It also means "doing things against your will", although it has the additional sense of doing them because you're gullible (not sure if this sense is also present in the English expression).