Even if that wasn't against the First Amendment (which is a more complicated issue [1]), that wouldn't fly politically in the US. The side which likes law enforcement also currently puts emphasis on free speech, and the side which doesn't like the police wouldn't want them to be in charge of censorship.
I think a company doing that would make everyone their enemy, and generate a lot of bad PR.
[1]: For example, see https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chilling_effect
Of course, this is nothing like allowing arbitrary content censorship in collaboration with law enforcement, which would indeed trigger a lot more outrage and bad PR.
0: https://www.apple.com/legal/transparency/us.html
1: https://transparencyreport.google.com/user-data/us-national-...
[1]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_security_letter