Hacker News Reader

HNHacker News

Top New Best Ask Show Jobs

Comment by qwertyuiop_ | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

qwertyuiop_·

View on HN

There are other potential explanations for your observation[1]. Do you think you could be subject to confirmation bias?

[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/x2jj3s/obi...

The post is showing that the rate of side effects is lower than placebo.

>Btw look up “suddenly died” in google and the ages of the individuals that did in the past year.

Maybe do the same for prior years first.

> The post is showing that the rate of side effects is lower than placebo.

That's completely false:

> The Pfizer trial exhibited a 36 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group

> The Moderna trial exhibited a 6 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group

Given that Moderna's dose is 100ug vs Pfizer's 30ug with the spike protein being the same and the other ingredients very similar, 6% over placebo is basically nothing and suggests that Pfizer's results might be a fluke.

Anyone can go on vaers and lie. You aren't proving the point you think you are.

https://hillreporter.com/dont-be-fooled-antivaxxers-misrepre...

They could have in the past too.

Is there a conspiracy going on now?

The psychological and political incentives for people to manipulate an unverifiable public database are obvious. Antivaxxers are a well known group of troublemakers.

"The others" you mean.

I don't. I said what I meant.

However, there is also data that suggests large gaps in reporting coverage as well.

"... fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported." https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publicatio...

So the best indicator of harm from vaccines allowed its well to be poisoned from the start? Certainly smells bad.

You mean worst indicator

Reply on news.ycombinator.com