And if I wanted my $20 back then I should send a letter to some address.
I did, but I guess they just saw "oh, doesn't even live in NYC. Fuck him, and thanks for the free $20".
I'm still bitter.
And if I wanted my $20 back then I should send a letter to some address.
I did, but I guess they just saw "oh, doesn't even live in NYC. Fuck him, and thanks for the free $20".
I'm still bitter.
I for one, am not sad to see this whole thing go away.
If you're in from out of town, why are you leaving a ton of money on your card and/or not buying the $33 unlimited pass for 7 days that essentially pays for itself if you take a single trip each day? There's no minimum value you have to put on it either, so you can just put $5 on before every round trip or such and worst case you're out $2.50 if it expires before you use the return trip if you're trying to be that cautious.
I've got my issues with the MTA, but it seems far from an intentional grift.
They expire quickly (12-18 months) because the magnetic stripe wears out quickly.
I have a (not directly) related hypothesis I heard stated once about vouchers and bonus programs once.
If the operator takes your $20 to buy a metro card, they made $20 of income. The $20 of "value" the card now holds is accounted for.
Assuming a metro card never expires would means that the operator would have to account for this value to be in existence for perpetuity.
If 1% of metro cards never expired but still had 20$ on them, there would be an ever-growing amount of money-to-be-accounted-for which (I've been told) is a bit of a nightmare since it's technically a liquidity, but obviously unavailable to the company.
It's obviously shitty for the customer, but there's seemingly some sort of (tax/business) logic behind it.
The company can spend the cash as they see fit but if the item is refundable or use of the item incurs costs, they need some cash on hand to handle people digging up old cards and using/refunding them.
Right, and if you're heavily investing, you would want to minimize the necessary cash on hand.
I remember hearing that's why a supermarket had a scheme recently where they would redeem (virtual) bonus points for a rebate directly applicable to your purchase (as opposed to accumulating until some arbitrary limit before that would happen) - simply so the company could figure out what percentage of people would take that chance to redeem the points.
However, the coupon has no accounting value beyond its $0.0001 face value.
I'm sure there are even more oddities and complications a tax accountant can mention that I'm not even aware of.