Much of my take is, if you want an EV then you should be ready for solar as well. EVs and solar are a great combination that can support the grid in emergency.
45% of Californians are renters. They don't control whether or not solar is installed.
Given your assertion and that fact, is making it illegal to purchase a car with an internal combustion engine a good idea or a bad one?
Many things are possible between now and 2035, and a mandate/subsidy for landlords to install chargers is one of those possibilities.
That could be said about any opinion shared. Regardless of your opinion of my assertions, energy source and costs are a necessary factor in the economics of operating BEVs. If you can't source cost effective solar energy, it may not make economic sense (long term, as costs rise) to own a BEV for renters. Per mandates/subsidy, the subsidy already exists (may need adjustments), a mandate may be necessary.
I don't think that's related to the outcomes of the transition to an EV mandate for new sales, which is what the respondent was asking about. Sure, it's nice to have your own solar panels, but it's not a requirement for EV ownership, and I was pointing out that your assertion, whether true or false, was unnecessary for the EV transition to be a "good idea" in the parent poster's words.
That said, regardless of how you power your vehicle, even in some of the most expensive power markets, overnight charging is cheaper than gas, both economically and environmentally.
Some chargers also supports these settings.
Unless it ships from the factory with "charge only during hours X to Y" preset and turned on, the vast majority are not going to get set for a delayed charge time, and will simply charge whenever plugged in. And their owners are likely to "plug them in" at the end of every trip so they are sure to be "topped up" for their next trip.
Hey look, you answered your own question!
(or maybe I am totally wrong, I am not from the US, in my location I cant install a 11 kW charger by myself legally).
For the US, no you are not "totally wrong". The majority of 11kW EV charge ports will have been installed by an electrician and also inspected by the local govt. electrical inspector because the vast majority of people simply do not try do to this work themselves.
However, in many locations in the US, homeowners are allowed to do their own electrical installs, provided they pull a permit and have the required inspection performed. Those should also meet code, as otherwise the inspector should have failed the install.
Which only leaves those who will do the install without pulling a permit and having an inspection. What percentage of the total those would be I do not know, but given that few do their own electrical work anyway, it is probably a very small percentage of the total. And a sub-set of those would do the install properly to code anyway, even without the permit and inspection.
Also, I'm curious: in my country it is pretty common to have 11.5 kWh installation at home (it was even before advent of electric cars), is the US somehow limited in that regard?