I found that claim to be fairly surprising, SQLite is pretty bad when it comes to transactions per second. SQLite even owns up to it in the FAQ:
>it will only do a few dozen transactions per second.
I found that claim to be fairly surprising, SQLite is pretty bad when it comes to transactions per second. SQLite even owns up to it in the FAQ:
>it will only do a few dozen transactions per second.
That is an extremely poor quote taken way out of context.
The full quote is:
FAQ: "[Question] INSERT is really slow - I can only do few dozen INSERTs per second. [Answer] Actually, SQLite will easily do 50,000 or more INSERT statements per second on an average desktop computer. But it will only do a few dozen transactions per second. Transaction speed is limited by the rotational speed of your disk drive. A transaction normally requires two complete rotations of the disk platter, which on a 7200RPM disk drive limits you to about 60 transactions per second."
> Actually, SQLite will easily do 50,000 or more INSERT statements per second on an average desktop computer. But it will only do a few dozen transactions per second. Transaction speed is limited by the rotational speed of your disk drive. A transaction normally requires two complete rotations of the disk platter, which on a 7200RPM disk drive limits you to about 60 transactions per second.