I don't know. If I claimed to uphold the sacred tenets of free speech and expression I probably wouldn't want to be associated with a website that has a profound chilling effect on free speech and expression.

Is hate and ridicule expressed publically and unchallenged not just a DDoS against a group of people's right to expression?

When it's evident that some speech can quell other speech, which speech do we choose?

Cloudflare say "both" by taking money from the oppressor and giving it to the oppressed. I'd suggest this is- while something of a poetic justice- wholly insufficient and that Cloudflare should exercise the morals they claim to possess.