The self driving software packages that work, the Cruze and Waymos and Mercedes of the world, are in limited careful rollout. These companies and teams want to make sure it’s safe and robust before entering mass market adoption.
Tesla is one of the weakest and most immature offerings of the major players, and it has been given the widest distribution. It is utterly frustrating.
The abuse starts with using the phrase "artificial intelligence".
Selling what we call a computer as "intelligent" is like selling a DVD player as "creative" for it's ability to produce video. They are both just play back devices --- reproducing the work of others. Useful for sure but no more "intelligent" or "creative" than a hammer.
Any answer that "AI" provides has no assurance of correctness. It's up to you to judge if the probability is acceptable.
Do you really want to trust a self driving vehicle that misinterprets it's environment 20% of the time?
AI also includes things like expert systems, which don't autmatically learn, adapt to much or recognize any patterns.
The AI name works for me because it is goal oriented. Artificial Intelligence is implementing artificial systems that perform tasks that would otherwise require an intelligence (eg a human) to perform.
It doesn't really specify how you do that, it's just about what you're having it do.