Well. Apparently "penis on park bench" is an "inappropriate" query.
However, "lot of child dying in a massive fire" is an a-okay query with some "interesting" results.
Prudes are such a weird bunch.
However, "lot of child dying in a massive fire" is an a-okay query with some "interesting" results.
Prudes are such a weird bunch.
First, the filters are only on the interface. The research is public. That's why there has been an explosion of new implementations. You are welcome to run the code yourself and make the horniest model you like.
But more importantly, this comes up every time, and everyone acts SO confused. But why? Artificial Intelligence is MASSIVE mainstream news. New advancements are arriving daily.
Do you want the news stories to be dominated by whatever heinous shit some bad-faith giggly teenager with a call of the void to offend as much as possible (i know, i was one) is able to generate?
Do you want the discourse to be dominated with "Won't someone think of the children?" blocking legitimate research and progress?
Europeans always like to dunk on Americans for being "prudes", but only a tiny section of Western Europe is progressive enough to not mind random nipples on their bus ads and television. All of Eastern Europe, Africa, India, and China are culturally still fairly conservative about sex - at least out in the open.
People think that preventing racist or sexual use of these models is indulging the prudish mores of America. But that itself is a very narrow perspective that ignores the perspectives of billions of people in the world.
Your argument is entirely descriptive. We know why they do this. What should be argued here is how stupid and sad it is to block progress due to nothing more than religious or moral values.
I don't mean this in a moralistic sense. I have no qualms about images of blowjobs. I have no doubt that the porn industry has already deployed these models and is experimenting with this without filters. As a monetizable way to reduce the human costs, it's an entirely logical step, and adult performers should be as nervous as artists, and talking to lawyers.
But PROGRESS???
Moreover, sexuality is perhaps the most important theme in art, historically. It is a very legitimate thing to want to include in a tool such as this one. Its censorship is akin to "moral codes" of the past, completely regressive.
While I am entirely pro liberty in terms of consumption of pornography, it is not a replacement for human interaction, and can be used in conjunction with other tools to dehumanize and isolate individuals. Some individuals that then make negative contributions to the rest of society at large. These are not isolated incidents, and they've been rising: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misogynist_terrorism
There are many kinds of porn - some that exploit women, some that empower them in their production. And there are also many kinds of products - ones that focus on a human connection (whether vanilla or kinky) and ones that don't.
I would absolutely worry that artificial porn would be good enough to meet some of these demands but not most, and would ultimately be a net negative for society.
> Moreover, sexuality is perhaps the most important theme in art, historically.
I mean, it's demonstrably not, religious art imagery dominates by volume. But that's also not necessarily important - that's just who happened to be patrons of arts and had the means to commission them.
I'm not gonna deny that humans are horny and want to make lots of sexy art.
But you're also not going to get porn on basic cable. You have to seek that out extra for yourself, and that's going to be the case with AI-generated porn art also.
I agree with you that this probably is required while the tech is new and then eventually won't be when everyone and their dog can run these things locally on their phone.
How is that the only alternative?
That discussion is over. You shouldn't care about a company trying to filter out bad shit on their own platform.
Pandoras box has already been open.
Of course that’s not what hentai means either.