Hacker News Reader

Why not do the opposite and give each computer hundreds of addresses?

Because NAT is easier.

And yes, NAT is bad, ugly and from hell.

How is NAT, which requires an intermediary (the NAT router/device) be configured and put in place in addition to the router, easier than IPv6 privacy addresses, where you just turn your computer on and let the router route?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com