No I did read your post. Actually I read all of them. My point is he didn't "break" composition. In isn't like you import this guy's library and suddenly function composition no longer works. Breaking isn't the right word. It is agressive and wrong on a semantic level.

You could say "You functional list does not properly support composition. Here are some problems." You posts were needlessly combative. I only spoke out because I have seen this kind of thing cropping up recently with respect to Python functional libraries.

"people are encouraged to write python other people understand."

As I said, the semantics of his library are reasonably clear on inspection doubly so if you read the docs.

EDIT:

I just re-read some of your other posts on this thread. You really do keep banging on "He made his own 'dialect.'" To clarify, no he didn't. Making a library isn't a dialect. A dialect needs to be a significant enough departure that you would actually need a different parser/interpreter. That is a "dialect." If you would like I can point you actual Python dialects. This is a library. Deal with it.