Anyone else find the way they got to this number to be a bit sketchy? There's only a vague description of how they apply some ecological model. (One which, I'm sure, they can never really validate)
I know literacy was low, but that’s just unreasonable. “People only use 10% of their brains” territory.
If we include the larger categories (like the religious texts) then it would be higher, but not that much higher, given the many man-months of work each copy required.