Also: my sense is that getting the best results often requires a lot of extra coaching with style/detail words. As we can't see the prompt here, we don't know what sort of style/details were requested. GIGO.
Also: my sense is that getting the best results often requires a lot of extra coaching with style/detail words. As we can't see the prompt here, we don't know what sort of style/details were requested. GIGO.
https://labs.openai.com/s/9YF5WxF1GoZVdzpLBAQYp2Zg
https://labs.openai.com/s/wBfHevs9hIZXvzkJ686mFmn3
https://labs.openai.com/s/M0i029fZnYjQXHFobUpw7eun (best of batch imo)
https://labs.openai.com/s/Hf4z0M9M3KBr6IaaKsjEt9Mx
A few more tries didn't manage to create any photorealistic shots with actual cucumbers-in-seats – perhaps due to the absurd contrasts required – but shifting to a 'cartoon' style with the prompt "editorial cartoon of the King of Belgium giving a speech to many cheering cucumbers, professional illustrator" got a lot closer:
https://labs.openai.com/s/4IonSKYkl0okhNvzJmEAH30K (good)
https://labs.openai.com/s/ZeadCzZ9WqeASYXPlOb13wDV (good)
https://labs.openai.com/s/nERf6bALKEBsQQBvPVsAH7o4 (good)
https://labs.openai.com/s/7dsZu3bwtfGZZxxJYtg9lTVf
If I had more time & credits to burn, I suspect working off those could eventually hit something really apt... but it takes some work & tinkering.
There's one screenshot showing the prompt – but in $CURRENT_YEAR, I view all screenshots with at least a little suspicion, especially when there was a way to highlight the pseuod-watermarked image – OpenAI's native 'Share' – that would've provided stronger proof, direct from OpenAI, of exactly the prompt associated with an image. Hoaxes are everywhere! I've added DALL-E bottom-right color-squares to non-DALL-E images, & seen others do the same, as a subtle joke.
So I generally believe the OP, but don't rule-out the possibility there's been tampering to make some point.