if you are inventing a new way to do existing things outside the idioms of the language there is no conceivable way you can claim to be pythonic.
you are replacing the pythonic style with your own taste.
don't confuse the two.
you are replacing the pythonic style with your own taste.
don't confuse the two.
But I do agree that it is not 'Pythonic' - except maybe in the trivial sense that it's written in Python.
I would be happy to go into more detail if you really want it.
Re-inventing a uniform syntax for python is the least pythonic thing you can do.