Hacker News Reader

Depending on what and how the FBI screwed up, it's actually possible today. It's innocent until proven guilty, and if they screwed up in obtaining a key piece of evidence, then it and anything stemming from it will be inadmissible in court. If they can't prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt without that evidence, then the defendant will be found not guilty.

View on HN

Anything is possible, but that doesn't mean it should be automatic as proposed.

Yes it does. Especially when the nature of the evidence is exculpatory, and was in the State's custody at time of the proceeding, and maliciously destroyed by a State actor. Adverse inference is a two way street. If you want to use it as justification to help the Prosecution when a Defendant destroys evidence, it must work the other way around as well. Due Process was thwarted.

>evidence is exculpatory

So now you potentially go to trial with that evidence.

How exactly is that possible if said evidence has been destroyed by a state actor?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com