Hacker News Reader

No it is not completely wrong.

It is very dependent on geography. The discussion regarding beef/cattle/meat always takes some "global-scale-scope" which is useless since the topology, soil, water etc. is something that almost exclusively determines what is suitable to grow.

You could not, how much you wanted convert the gracing pastures in Sweden to any high-yield farm.

View on HN

My looking at pictures and videos of such fields in Sweden you seem very wrong. Many videos show cows side by side crops and the land looks no different.

Maybe it is about soil composition, something you don't see in a picture?

But sure, keep on looking at a picture of grass and decide that the land is suitable for other crops.

Well, when the fields are right next to each other, I dunno. Anyway, I'd rather go on pictures and videos over some random commenter online.

Haha.

The next time you leave for the wilderness, go to a field, go the edge of it and see if you can figure out if there was a reason they didn't expand it further out.

I wouldn't dream of asking you of taking a random commenter at face value.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com