That's because it is. Author is an OpenBSD fan/user, and have updated this article many times as the years pass.
Maybe time for them to write an article on OpenBSD's pros directly instead of indirectly by attacking FreeBSD.
Maybe time for them to write an article on OpenBSD's pros directly instead of indirectly by attacking FreeBSD.
I still preferred filling my multi-Gb/s pipes with backups for an hour or two every night instead of having replication take most of the day at ~300Mb/s. I need backups to be replicated nightly off-site before the start of business. The largest single backup job alone would have been too slow to finish in time after a busy day over unpatched SSH. I needed a tool that's fast enough to finish transfers in the available time window. Had FreeBSD shipped an unpatched SSH I would've had to implement most of its core features in something else instead of running a multi-threaded implementation of the same symmetric ciphers.
Still waiting for a reasoned rebuttal, rather than dismissing them summarily because they like another OS.
Also, what is wrong in updating an article so it stays relevant and doesn't refer to things that have been fixed?