Hacker News Reader

We've militarized the police because of the long term damage done during riots. The economic impact of riots in the 60s and 70s can not be overstated and is often overlooked when we have these discussions: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40056402#metadata_info_tab_cont....

View on HN

You don't stop riots by shooting at them. You stop riots by preventing or resolving the economic and social conditions that lead to them; that is, by improving the quality of life of those who have the lowest quality of life.

Unfortunately, shooting at them is easier to both conceptualize and implement, so governments tend to simply do that anyway.

That is... really complicated. 'Just improve their standard of living bro' isn't a real solution. It's like saying we can prevent murder by systemically renouncing violence and becoming a more peaceful society. This is obviously true, but the path forward is not obvious.

Right. The actual solution is complicated, so we default to easy "solutions" that don't work. That's the exact point I just made.

> We've militarized the police because of the long term damage done during riots.

Interesting—I've always assumed that we militarized the police because the military wanted to recoup some of the costs from replacing their hardware.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com