>EU law also applied sanctions against US companies and their executives for making Title III complaints.
>The United Kingdom had previously introduced provisions by statutory instrument[8] extending its Protection of Trading Interests Act 1980 (originally passed in the wake of extraterritorial claims by the U.S. in the 1970s) to United States rules on trade with Cuba. United Kingdom law was later extended to counter-act the Helms–Burton Act as well.
>Mexico passed a law in October 1996 aimed at neutralizing the Helms–Burton Act. The law provides for a fine of 2.2 million pesos, or $280,254, against anyone who while in Mexican territory obeys another country's laws aimed at reducing Mexican trade or foreign investment in a third country.
>Similarly, Canada passed a law to counteract the effect of Helms-Burton
Not the same counter measures as the ones proposed by the original user but it seems to have the same effect of "neutering" a foreign law.