> I don't need to agree with the total cosmology of every individual FOSS maintainer.
Well, sure. But since we're here, talking about neonazis, and we disagree with neonazism (right, deepdiver?), I'll pass on their software.
Let me rephrase it.
I wont politically check every author of every software i use, but since the internet randomly revealed to me this group of neonazis write that software, I won't use it.
That said I've used their tools and I'm not a fan. It's far to minimalistic for me.
You're begging the question. They're edgy conservatives, clearly. Neo-Nazis? Show me. I object to a blinkered political hypersensitivity that permits on the one hand violent, authoritarian tendencies if you're far enough left, and bans on the other hand anyone right of Bill Clinton. I think it's unhealthy for the FOSS community and tech as a whole.
>and we disagree with neonazism (right, deepdiver?)
And we don't beat our wives. Right, gtsop?
Everything was in the links, no need to re-iterate.
> And we don't beat our wives. Right, gtsop?
I don't, can't speak for others. Dodging a question with another one won't cut it though. Seems like it's extremely hard for you to even suggest neonazism is remotely bad. First you see nothing of substance to suckless' activity and then you make references of the far left to somehow balance out the existence of neonazis. I wonder what your arguments would be was it not for the for the far left existing.
Disagreeing and conversing is a necessity to humankind. You say my rhetoric is bad, I say yours is, let history decide.
Even ACLU defended KKK's right to speech in the 90's.
I don't align with their ideology just as I don't align with a million other ideologies. I want to protect their right to speech though.