There is an incredibly long list of precedents:
Scroll through that and once you get to the bottom tell me people are still being unreasonable...
I am glad to hear (anonymous) confirmation that it isn't getting killed though.
Here, there is none.
A company's operating history is absolutely relevant to whether or not people believe rumors about it's operations.
You said the rumor is baseless, but that list is a rock solid foundation for any rumor of Google cancelling anything.
Google Cloud is another story, they don't seem to shut down anything there and you have actual support lines. But we aren't talking about that here.
Also, you seem to be implying that you also have an anonymous source at Google (or are one yourself). Either way, the credibility of your comment isn't any better than that Twitter account, even if you think HN commenters are "higher caliber" than people on Twitter.
Stadia will exist by the end of the summer. You don’t have to believe me. Like I said feel free to come back to this thread in October.
To the parent commenter's point, you said, "This is absolutely false". Do you have actual evidence otherwise, or are you making baseless conjecture based on, well... baseless conjecture?
Proving a negative is generally difficult to begin with.
>Believing baseless conjecture is dumb imo.
So, it's dumb to believe baseless conjecture, but we should believe your baseless conjecture that someone else's baseless conjecture is wrong.