Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

olliej

The links on the page seem broken, I did quick hunt around to get this better central link:

https://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/poplog/freepoplo...

Or direct to the primer:

https://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/poplog/primer/

Both of which seem like they are more reliable

View on HN

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POP-11

was helpful for me as well

This confused me in many ways; 1) why did someone submit a site that was mostly broken and really didn't show what pop-11 was or looked like, and 2) why did it trend to the front page at all?

Why do people on this site keep pushing sites that are just broken. I really wish there was an automatic down-voting of people that submit sites that are broken, pay-walled, or break the browser in some new and fun way.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com