> Housing and land is a non-transable good, and therefore there should be heavy state intervention on it
That's a bold claim. What led you to believe that's the case? And what is a "non-transable good"?
That's a bold claim. What led you to believe that's the case? And what is a "non-transable good"?
Basically you cant move supply around.
Unless there's a definition, saying that this property calls for heavy state intervention is indeed a bold claim.
Asking the original poster for clarification of terms would be the move before assuming something
Compare: "Abortion is a non-transable good and therefore there should be heavy state intervention in it." "Video games are non-transable goods and so there should be heavy state intervention in it." "Cryptography is a non-transable good and therefore should heavily be regulated by the government."
All of these are BOLD claims regardless of what non-transable means, and it's appropriate to ask what non-transable means in order to understand why the bold claim stands.