So if you want to be as close as possible to as many people as possible, somewhere in Myanmar would be a better choice than London.
Of course the calculus changes if you also consider how much money each of these people has access to.
That changes the equation
I've also frequently seen "most" used to mean "a majority", though, in which case GP's use of the term is precisely consistent with the facts in their source.
https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/55920/is-most-eq...
“More than half of” is one of the definitions
UTC+8 is all of China and UTC+5.5 is all of India, and in between are high population countries like Indonesia, Philippines, Vietnam, so UTC+5.5 to UTC+8 has to be included.
UTC+11 to UTC-8.5 is the Pacific Ocean and has maybe 10 million people total, while UTC+0 has >100 million in UK, Portugal and part of Western Africa so UTC+0 must be part of the range.
That only leaves the choice between UTC-1/2 and UTC+9/10. UTC-1 and UTC-2 have under a million with only a few small islands while UTC+10 has most of Papua New Guinea with 6 million.
- Access to capital? - close to "action"? - Airport hub city?
Sufficiently advanced technology
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2012/mar/19/neutrin...