If fiscally incentivizing vigilantism isn't dystopian I don't know what is.
An elected legislature sanctioning civil action is "dystopian", but rioting and arson? Intimidating judges at their homes? Laundering a decade of domestic terrorism into universities and district attorneys' offices? Never heard of that stuff!
Not surprising to me, just absurd.
Vigilantism is not the same thing as community-led policing from members of said communities.
Argument by disparagement. Popular, but it has no force in reason.
I've never heard that term. Usually, the state has a monopoly on violence and justice - that's a definition of a sovereign state. Law enforcement is performed by police. Not sure where the other stuff you mention comes from.