If you want to make a red label with white letters on it that is named Awesome Cola, then you should absolutely be allowed to do that. If Coca Cola can’t protect their business by making the best product then they can frankly fuck right off. This is the European mindset at least, consumers owe nothing to corporations.
Luckily Denmark being Denmark, as soon as these things hit the news the public responds by hating the larger business and throwing amazing amounts of support at the small businesses. I just don’t think the law is very good when the public needs to circumvent it in order for the small businesses to survive, even when the small businesses are in the right to begin with.
So you are very likely absolutely correct, but because the world sort of sucks, the copyright law still hurts people it shouldn’t. I’m not sure there is an easy solution, because obviously you wouldn’t want direct copy products or DeWalt in stores either, but it’s certainly not good the way it is right now.
In the potato chip market in Australia, across multiple brands, purple means salt and vinegar, green means chicken, yellow means cheese and onion, blue means plain salt.
In the soft drink isle, red means cola, yellow means lemon, orange means orange, etc.
It does depend on the brand but these are usually the colours.
Yellow has to mean chicken though - it would be weird if it didn't!!
I'm shocked to learn of such a thing.
It's completely foreign to me too. I'm sure they're tasty, but I'm having trouble imagining what they would taste like.
Yet strangely it is perfectly legal for corporations to confuse consumers with misleading packaging and other tricks.
And I am sure if you actually allowed other ISPs in Germany using magenta as color you'll quickly see that nobody will confuse the two. Everyone unfortunate enough to interact with T-Mobile will be very aware of the differences.