> I assume it will accomplish helping the FCC realize that some people are upset about interference in the unlicensed bands
Trust me - they are very well aware of this - and Part 15 is already written with this in mind. No one is surprised that all the junk in the ISM band interferes - as I said elsewhere I think many of us are constantly amazed it works as well as it does.
This is also not enforceable interference - it does not meet the definition of “harmful interference”
> Report the issue as perceived, and give them a chance to surprise you with a useful outcome from that.
My question still remains - what do you think or hope this will accomplish?
Are you hoping they will carve out a slice of new spectrum for AirPods and give it to Apple for free?
> Refusing to report a problem just because (made up example) I think they don't care about Bluetooth
It’s not that they don’t care - it’s that this is getting really outside the scope of their regulations.
You do you, but the point of the federal complaint process is, well …“By filing a consumer complaint and telling your story, you contribute to federal enforcement and consumer protection efforts”
Consumer protection meaning scams and fraud over telecommunication or provision of services - its not a place to vent because your shitty electronics don’t work all the time - which is not fraud even though you may feel cheated. And there are no rules broken to enforce. Having read complaints I know that yours won’t nearly be the dumbest by far but it’s still dumb.