So if Google, Apple, and Mozilla all opposed this what are the chances it ever actually becomes useful?
Just because something was given the stamp of approval by the W3C doesn’t mean they actually have to implement it.
Just because something was given the stamp of approval by the W3C doesn’t mean they actually have to implement it.
Like, it's not a flat URI scheme leaving structure up to controllers. But it's also not a fully defined ontology.
Pick a use case description in section three. Any one. Each one could provoke an entire domain-specific organization into heated arguments about subrequirements and subsubrequirements.
Even if this recommendation doesn't make it, it's neat.
Any way you turn you walk into this system, right?
I think the W3C got lost in their XML dreams, and got huffed by WHATWG, whose standards I actively dislike.