Did they look in the same place that the evidence from Epstein's island is stored? Plausible deniability + "expert opinion" serving as the null hypothesis = institutional control of Occam's razor. I for one don't think there's anything about collusion or corruption here unless proof is presented... and since proof can't be found: nothing to see here, move along. I'm sure our government agencies and these multinational corporations have our best interests at heart.