Great news.
The fact that a company from the unfriendly country collects biometrical data may finally provoke enough outrage that such data collection gets forbidden for everyone.
The fact that a company from the unfriendly country collects biometrical data may finally provoke enough outrage that such data collection gets forbidden for everyone.
Bringing up that TikTok collects biometric data will usually be met with blank stares and/or someone implying that it's a conspiracy theory.
But, I would imagine any such hypothetical regulation would have specific carve-outs for the US-based companies collecting the same/similar data. Because $.
Invasive data collection benefits the powerful, and harms the individual.
Nobody powerful gives a rat's ass about the individual.
They say that we don't learn by knowing but by doing, and a significant part of the incentive to do is pain.
The tragic irony lies in the fact that apparently, it only takes about 80 years to forget the last horrors —approximately one maximized average lifespan, makes sense I guess… Though what a piss-poor historical-attention span. Or about as much to collectively resign sensitivity to horror, as in the case of CCP-led China (1949-now).
You know the problem with things that concerns everyone: everybody thinks somebody else is taking care of it; in the end nobody does.
Hmm. What are you basing this on?
>> In 2015 George Osborne, the then chancellor, promised a ‘golden decade’ for Chinese-British relations as he drummed up support for new trade opportunities and inward investment.