You define "child" based on a religious definition. That's /your/ religion, not mine. Feel free to follow it all you want, you don't need to involve the rest of us. We're not talking about children, we're talking about fetuses.
> Do you really want to be play that game? Because I'll have a field day with you.
Ah, an internet tough guy. Feel free to "have a field day." Your entire argument is premised on the idea that a fetus is a human life, which only has basis in religion.
Fetuses are unborn children. I realize this definition is rather inconvenient to your fragile narrative, but it is THE definition, not just my definition. Please refer to the dictionary, #4: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/child
> a human fetus
Or the Merriam webster dictionary: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/child
> 3a : an unborn or recently born person
or the oxford dictionary: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/eng...
> a young human who is not yet an adult
Please, keep talking. I am enjoying this. Next you'll argue categorical definitions and facts are a religion.