Do you mean no evidence of his motivation, or no evidence that they've been committing miscegenation?
If you have a digesting problem with this, we may just call it nature but your comment is what could put many not at ease. That being said, I would at least guess we agree on the ruling that it gets us closer to nature and some commonly accepted ethic with regards to human life and procreation.
It's a reddit-level comment that doesn't add anything to the discussion.
That still makes it a rhetorical step up from Thomas's concurrence.