> I wonder if that's because Clarence and Ginni Thomas have been committing miscegenation for years?
Please, I'm eating. Besides, there's no evidence of this.
Please, I'm eating. Besides, there's no evidence of this.
If you have a digesting problem with this, we may just call it nature but your comment is what could put many not at ease. That being said, I would at least guess we agree on the ruling that it gets us closer to nature and some commonly accepted ethic with regards to human life and procreation.
It's a reddit-level comment that doesn't add anything to the discussion.
That still makes it a rhetorical step up from Thomas's concurrence.