Hacker News Reader

Just telling you the personal responsibility/slut shaming argument for banning abortion makes your side look weak as hell. At least those who claim fetus are alive have a somewhat respectable looking moral framework but when you reveal it's really about blaming women for having sex and forcing them to suffer for it it no matter how bad it is for woman and offspring , shows how nasty many "pro life" views are

If you want to come across as genuine, you might want to take a stab at not taking someone's ancedote and bastardizing to fit the scope in which you want to limit the topic you want to discuss.

It makes you appear out of touch with reality and self serving, rather than trying to make any attempt to understand.

Could a woman in the 1930s enforce a decision not to have sex with her husband?

I don't know, It was more of a hypothetical. They certainly can now.

Taking somebody’s real story to fall back to a hypothetical moralistic scenario? I’m confused if you think this helps you actually understand someone else’s beliefs.

Ultimately questions of right and wrong are entirely values based (barring belief in an absolute power, and I’m not aware of a way to pick absolute right and wrong without starting with some sort of unprovable assumption, one could charitably call “faith”)