I don't understand macroeconomics but "government spending causes inflation" is a pretty mainstream ideological precept - the opposite opinion is fringe.
Edit: maybe I didn't put enough weight on "massive" when reading the above comment
I don't understand macroeconomics but "government spending causes inflation" is a pretty mainstream ideological precept - the opposite opinion is fringe.
Edit: maybe I didn't put enough weight on "massive" when reading the above comment
Hoo boy.
"the current Fed chair, Jerome H. Powell, has dismissed claims that the Fed’s money-printing is fueling today’s price spiral, emphasizing instead the disruptions associated with reopening the economy. Like his most recent predecessors, dating to Alan Greenspan, Powell says that financial innovations mean there no longer is a link between the amount of money circulating in the economy and rising prices"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/02/06/federal-r...
You're right that the idea government money printing doesn't cause inflation is fringe absurdity. Unfortunately the fringe that believes in it are central bankers.
What seems more likely?
- Central bankers who control the economy do not understand the basic principles of the system they manage.
- They lie about their motivations for political reasons.
The more interesting question is, if you incentives are strong enough to want to deny the nature of a system, do you become a liar or do you genuinely stop understanding it? Was Yellen's bafflement at the non-transitory inflation a mere act, or was it genuine confusion caused by a core corruption of her own understanding of basic economics?
It's hard to understate the degree to which fed economists didn't see this coming.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/on-inflation-economics-has-some...
It was pretty obvious what was about to happen!