Only when cities prioritize and are designed for pedestrians instead of cars will pedestrian safety improve.
We need more spaces that are pedestrian and bicycle only.
We need more spaces that are pedestrian and bicycle only.
What if we could make every car $5-10k more expensive instead?
</satire>
I once thought that using AI to make all cars self driving might be the key to making pedestrians and cyclists safe. Self driving cars are playing a game of Russian Roulette. The systems will get it wrong occasionally, with LIDAR or without. Not if, but when. Whether or not someone dies depends on the situation.
But I've also sat in those city council meetings and seen the inane opposition people have to any sort of positive reform in that direction. Self driving vehicles have the potential to actually improve road safety because local governments won't be involved.
Two questions, then. Firstly, do you think that self-driving vehicles will ever get even close to human standards of driving? And second, what do you see as the big challenges to getting them to be acceptably safe?
As for safety, that's both a big topic and a "I have explicitly told not talk about this in public by legal" topic. The teams and organizations I've worked for take it very seriously, but things can always be improved. Phil Koopman puts out some excellent information about where we are currently and where industry could broadly improve.
Okay, bearing in mind your second paragraph, what are the conditions under which they're safer? I've been in a few self-driving cars and I'd struggle to see how they would ever get to an acceptable standard - like, pass UK driving test kind of standard.
Why think through and implement hard political decisions when you can throw money at nerds to make a profit instead?
Simple traffic cameras would also make roads much safer but they are politically very difficult.
It's just not possible for soft 70kg humans to safely be near hard 2000kg objects moving quickly.